Screener
HFND vs GGM
Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF vs GGM Macro Alignment ETF
Key differences
- GGM costs 0.13% less per year.
- HFND is classified as alternative, while GGM is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- HFND follows a multi strategy strategy; GGM uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| HFND | GGM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.07% | 0.94% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $32M | $18M |
| Since | 2022 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 4.72% | 1.48% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.4% | +13.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.63 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.44% | 11.32% |
| Max drawdown | -13.31% | -19.68% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HFND and GGM
Explore further