Screener
HFND vs HFGM
Unlimited HFND Multi-Strategy Return Tracker ETF vs Unlimited HFGM Global Macro ETF
Key differences
- HFGM costs 0.06% less per year.
- HFGM is significantly larger than HFND — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- HFND follows a multi strategy strategy; HFGM uses tactical allocation.
Side-by-side comparison
| HFND | HFGM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.07% | 1.01% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $32M | $133M |
| Since | 2022 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 4.72% | 5.05% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | multi strategy | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | +18.4% | +42.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.63 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.44% | 22.77% |
| Max drawdown | -13.31% | -10.66% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to HFND and HFGM
Explore further