Screener
IBAT vs GII
iShares Energy Storage & Materials ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Global Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- GII costs 0.07% less per year.
- GII is significantly larger than IBAT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- GII has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IBAT | GII | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $65M | $989M |
| Since | 2024 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.77% | 2.85% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +125.9% | +17.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +11.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.98 |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.23% | 10.56% |
| Max drawdown | -28.26% | -42.84% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IBAT and GII
Explore further