Screener
IBOT vs BBH
Vaneck Robotics ETF vs VanEck Biotech ETF
Key differences
- BBH costs 0.12% less per year.
- BBH is significantly larger than IBOT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, IBOT has delivered higher annualized returns.
- BBH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IBOT | BBH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $71M | $365M |
| Since | 2023 | 2011 |
| Dividend yield | 0.32% | 0.52% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +58.1% | +26.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.4% | +5.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.93 | 0.19 |
| Volatility 1Y | 22.06% | 18.82% |
| Max drawdown | -25.39% | -39.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IBOT and BBH
Explore further