Screener
ICLO vs LQDB
Invesco AAA CLO Floating Rate Note ETF vs iShares BBB Rated Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- ICLO is significantly larger than LQDB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ICLO follows a active selection strategy; LQDB uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| ICLO | LQDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $448M | $52M |
| Since | 2022 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 5.26% | 4.63% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.7% | +6.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.8% | +5.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.22 | 0.41 |
| Volatility 1Y | 1.39% | 4.15% |
| Max drawdown | -3.46% | -21.63% |
Similar to ICLO and LQDB
Explore further