Screener
ICOP vs METL
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF vs Sprott Active Metals & Miners ETF
Key differences
- ICOP costs 0.52% less per year.
- ICOP is significantly larger than METL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ICOP follows a index tracking strategy; METL uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| ICOP | METL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.99% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $429M | $95M |
| Since | 2023 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.85% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +95.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 36.97% | — |
| Max drawdown | -38.67% | -27.39% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ICOP and METL
Explore further