Screener
IEMG vs KEMX
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF vs KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF
Key differences
- IEMG costs 0.15% less per year.
- IEMG is significantly larger than KEMX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, KEMX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IEMG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IEMG | KEMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.09% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $151.2B | $118M |
| Since | 2012 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 2.37% | 2.67% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +49.6% | +74.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.5% | +29.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.3% | +14.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.09 | 1.30 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.35% | 22.26% |
| Max drawdown | -38.71% | -38.80% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IEMG and KEMX
Explore further