Screener
IMFL vs IPKW
Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs Invesco International BuyBack Achievers ETF
Key differences
- IMFL costs 0.21% less per year.
- IMFL follows a active selection strategy; IPKW uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, IPKW has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IPKW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IMFL | IPKW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.34% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $957M | $530M |
| Since | 2021 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 3.02% | 3.51% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.7% | +29.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.6% | +24.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.2% | +10.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 1.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.80% | 14.37% |
| Max drawdown | -33.25% | -47.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IMFL and IPKW
Explore further