Screener
IMFL vs PKW
Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs Invesco BuyBack Achievers ETF
Key differences
- IMFL costs 0.28% less per year.
- IMFL covers global markets; PKW covers north america.
- IMFL follows a active selection strategy; PKW uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, PKW has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PKW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IMFL | PKW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.34% | 0.62% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $957M | $1.6B |
| Since | 2021 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 3.02% | 0.89% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.7% | +18.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.6% | +18.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.2% | +10.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 0.94 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.80% | 13.30% |
| Max drawdown | -33.25% | -40.93% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IMFL and PKW
Explore further