Screener
IPKW vs MTRA
Invesco International BuyBack Achievers ETF vs Invesco International Growth Focus ETF
Key differences
- IPKW is significantly larger than MTRA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IPKW follows a index tracking strategy; MTRA uses active selection.
- IPKW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IPKW | MTRA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.54% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $530M | $142M |
| Since | 2014 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 3.51% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.3% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.21 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.37% | — |
| Max drawdown | -47.24% | -15.77% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IPKW and MTRA
Explore further