Screener
IMFL vs QVML
Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF
Key differences
- QVML costs 0.23% less per year.
- IMFL covers global markets; QVML covers north america.
- IMFL follows a active selection strategy; QVML uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, QVML has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IMFL | QVML | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.34% | 0.11% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $957M | $1.6B |
| Since | 2021 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 3.02% | 1.04% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.9% | +28.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.1% | +22.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | 1.22 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.75% | 11.85% |
| Max drawdown | -33.25% | -23.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IMFL and QVML
Explore further