Screener
IMFL vs OMFS
Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- IMFL is significantly larger than OMFS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IMFL covers global markets; OMFS covers north america.
- IMFL follows a active selection strategy; OMFS uses index enhanced.
Side-by-side comparison
| IMFL | OMFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.34% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $957M | $275M |
| Since | 2021 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 3.02% | 0.93% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.9% | +30.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.1% | +15.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.8% | +6.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | 0.63 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.75% | 17.63% |
| Max drawdown | -33.25% | -42.50% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IMFL and OMFS
Explore further