Screener
IMFL vs QVMS
Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF vs Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF
Key differences
- QVMS costs 0.19% less per year.
- IMFL is significantly larger than QVMS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IMFL covers global markets; QVMS covers north america.
- IMFL follows a active selection strategy; QVMS uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| IMFL | QVMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.34% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $957M | $232M |
| Since | 2021 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 3.02% | 1.15% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +32.9% | +32.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.1% | +15.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | 0.65 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.75% | 17.73% |
| Max drawdown | -33.25% | -28.05% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IMFL and QVMS
Explore further