Screener
INTL vs XNAV
Main International ETF vs FundX Aggressive ETF
Key differences
- INTL costs 0.43% less per year.
- INTL is significantly larger than XNAV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- INTL follows a option income strategy; XNAV uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, XNAV has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XNAV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| INTL | XNAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.84% | 1.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $222M | $31M |
| Since | 2022 | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | 2.37% | 0.51% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.7% | +41.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.7% | +24.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.85 | 1.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.26% | 16.40% |
| Max drawdown | -14.48% | -24.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to INTL and XNAV
Explore further