Screener
IPAC vs ECNS
iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF vs iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF
Key differences
Both IPAC and ECNS are equity ETFs. IPAC charges 0.09% a year and ECNS 0.59%. The main difference: IPAC covers the Asia-Pacific region; ECNS covers emerging markets.
- IPAC covers the Asia-Pacific region; ECNS covers emerging markets.
- IPAC costs 0.50% less per year.
- IPAC is much larger than ECNS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, IPAC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IPAC | ECNS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.09% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.6B | $71M |
| Since | 2014 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 3.80% | 6.40% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.6% | +7.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.3% | +7.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.2% | -7.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.82 | 0.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.74% | 21.06% |
| Max drawdown | -31.00% | -63.44% |
Similar to IPAC and ECNS
Explore further