Screener
IPAC vs FLJP
iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF vs Franklin FTSE Japan ETF
Key differences
- Over the last 3 years, FLJP has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| IPAC | FLJP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.09% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.5B | $3.5B |
| Since | 2014 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 3.92% | 4.66% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | asia pacific |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.3% | +33.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.5% | +18.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.1% | +9.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.79 | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.58% | 19.13% |
| Max drawdown | -31.00% | -32.49% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IPAC and FLJP
Explore further