Screener
IPKW vs IMFL
Invesco International BuyBack Achievers ETF vs Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- IMFL costs 0.21% less per year.
- IPKW follows a index tracking strategy; IMFL uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, IPKW has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IPKW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IPKW | IMFL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.34% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $530M | $957M |
| Since | 2014 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 3.51% | 3.02% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.0% | +33.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.3% | +16.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.3% | +9.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.21 | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.37% | 15.80% |
| Max drawdown | -47.24% | -33.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IPKW and IMFL
Explore further