Screener
MTRA vs PKW
Invesco International Growth Focus ETF vs Invesco BuyBack Achievers ETF
Key differences
- MTRA costs 0.08% less per year.
- PKW is significantly larger than MTRA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MTRA follows a active selection strategy; PKW uses index tracking.
- PKW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MTRA | PKW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.54% | 0.62% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $142M | $1.6B |
| Since | 2025 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.89% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +18.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +18.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.94 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 13.30% |
| Max drawdown | -15.77% | -40.93% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MTRA and PKW
Explore further