Screener
ISMF vs BILT
iShares Managed Futures Active ETF vs iShares Infrastructure Active ETF
Key differences
ISMF is an alternative ETF, while BILT is an equity ETF. ISMF charges 0.80% a year and BILT 0.60%.
- ISMF is an alternative fund, while BILT is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- ISMF follows a managed futures strategy; BILT uses active selection.
- ISMF covers global markets; BILT covers North America.
- BILT costs 0.20% less per year.
Side-by-side comparison
| ISMF | BILT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.80% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $59M | $30M |
| Since | 2025 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 2.49% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | managed futures | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 8.02% | — |
| Max drawdown | -4.23% | -5.38% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.