Screener
IWB vs QNXT
iShares Russell 1000 ETF vs iShares Nasdaq-100 ex Top 30 ETF
Key differences
- IWB costs 0.05% less per year.
- IWB is significantly larger than QNXT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWB | QNXT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $46.2B | $17M |
| Since | 2000 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.96% | 0.66% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.9% | +22.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +13.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.21 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.07% | 14.97% |
| Max drawdown | -34.60% | -22.25% |
Similar to IWB and QNXT
Explore further