Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

IWD vs IWL

iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF vs iShares Russell Top 200 ETF

IWD

iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.18%

Fund size

$74.3B

IWL

iShares Russell Top 200 ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.15%

Fund size

$2.1B

Key differences

  • IWD is significantly larger than IWL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, IWL has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • IWD has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

IWDIWL
Annual cost (TER)0.18%0.15%
Fund size (AUM)$74.3B$2.1B
Since20002009
Dividend yield1.55%0.86%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+28.5%+30.1%
CAGR 3Y+18.3%+24.4%
CAGR 5Y+10.1%+14.7%
Sharpe 3Y1.091.28
Volatility 1Y10.88%12.34%
Max drawdown-38.51%-32.71%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to IWD and IWL