Screener
IWY vs RYLD
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF vs Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF
Key differences
- IWY costs 0.40% less per year.
- IWY is significantly larger than RYLD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWY is classified as equity, while RYLD is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- IWY follows a index tracking strategy; RYLD uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, IWY has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWY | RYLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $16.5B | $1.3B |
| Since | 2009 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 0.35% | 11.85% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.2% | +24.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +27.0% | +8.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +17.0% | +3.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.15 | 0.39 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.60% | 10.84% |
| Max drawdown | -32.68% | -41.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWY and RYLD
Explore further