Screener
IWY vs RYLG
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF vs Global X Russell 2000 Covered Call & Growth ETF
Key differences
- IWY costs 0.15% less per year.
- IWY is significantly larger than RYLG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IWY is classified as equity, while RYLG is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- IWY follows a index tracking strategy; RYLG uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, IWY has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IWY has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IWY | RYLG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.20% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $16.5B | $8M |
| Since | 2009 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.35% | 7.42% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.2% | +33.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +27.0% | +13.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +17.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.15 | 0.63 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.60% | 14.96% |
| Max drawdown | -32.68% | -22.37% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IWY and RYLG
Explore further