Screener
IXN vs REW
iShares Global Tech ETF vs ProShares UltraShort Technology
Key differences
- IXN costs 0.56% less per year.
- IXN is significantly larger than REW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IXN covers global markets; REW covers north america.
- IXN follows a index tracking strategy; REW uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, IXN has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IXN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IXN | REW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7.8B | $4M |
| Since | 2001 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.28% | 7.20% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +70.3% | -63.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +35.9% | -47.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +22.8% | -39.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.26 | -1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.79% | 41.72% |
| Max drawdown | -36.30% | -99.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IXN and REW
Explore further