Screener
IXN vs ROM
iShares Global Tech ETF vs ProShares Ultra Technology
Key differences
- IXN costs 0.56% less per year.
- IXN is significantly larger than ROM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IXN covers global markets; ROM covers north america.
- IXN follows a index tracking strategy; ROM uses leveraged.
- Over the last 3 years, ROM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IXN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IXN | ROM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $7.8B | $961M |
| Since | 2001 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.28% | 0.21% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | +70.3% | +141.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +35.9% | +58.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +22.8% | +30.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.26 | 1.14 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.79% | 41.47% |
| Max drawdown | -36.30% | -67.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IXN and ROM
Explore further