Screener
IYM vs UYM
iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF vs ProShares Ultra Materials
Key differences
- IYM costs 0.57% less per year.
- IYM is significantly larger than UYM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IYM follows a index tracking strategy; UYM uses leveraged.
- Over the last 3 years, IYM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IYM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IYM | UYM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $41M |
| Since | 2000 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 1.28% | 1.21% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | +40.5% | +35.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.1% | +12.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.0% | +3.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.67 | 0.41 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.73% | 33.86% |
| Max drawdown | -42.76% | -73.31% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IYM and UYM
Explore further