Screener
UYM vs MXI
ProShares Ultra Materials vs iShares Global Materials ETF
Key differences
- MXI costs 0.56% less per year.
- MXI is significantly larger than UYM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- UYM covers north america markets; MXI covers global.
- UYM follows a leveraged strategy; MXI uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, MXI has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| UYM | MXI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $41M | $325M |
| Since | 2007 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.21% | 1.78% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | leveraged | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.7% | +33.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.6% | +13.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +3.9% | +6.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.41 | 0.61 |
| Volatility 1Y | 33.86% | 19.47% |
| Max drawdown | -73.31% | -39.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to UYM and MXI
Explore further