Screener
IYT vs MOTO
iShares Transportation Average ETF vs Guinness Atkinson Smart Transportation & Technology ETF
Key differences
- IYT costs 0.30% less per year.
- IYT is significantly larger than MOTO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IYT follows a index tracking strategy; MOTO uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, MOTO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IYT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IYT | MOTO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.38% | 0.68% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.0B | $10M |
| Since | 2003 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 0.99% | 0.86% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.2% | +56.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.5% | +21.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.7% | +11.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.62 | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.23% | 21.11% |
| Max drawdown | -41.28% | -38.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IYT and MOTO
Explore further