Screener
KBA vs KEMX
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Index ETF vs KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF
Key differences
- KEMX costs 0.32% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, KEMX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- KBA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KBA | KEMX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.56% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $191M | $118M |
| Since | 2014 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 1.46% | 2.67% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +38.8% | +66.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.8% | +27.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.3% | +13.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.49 | 1.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.21% | 21.87% |
| Max drawdown | -45.32% | -38.80% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KBA and KEMX
Explore further