Screener
KBA vs OBOR
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Index ETF vs KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF
Key differences
- KBA costs 0.23% less per year.
- KBA is significantly larger than OBOR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, KBA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| KBA | OBOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.56% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $191M | $4M |
| Since | 2014 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.46% | 1.84% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.9% | +21.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.0% | +10.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.9% | +1.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.53 | 0.50 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.48% | 16.01% |
| Max drawdown | -45.32% | -39.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KBA and OBOR
Explore further