Screener
KBA vs KGRN
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Index ETF vs KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology ETF
Key differences
- KBA costs 0.23% less per year.
- KBA is significantly larger than KGRN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, KBA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| KBA | KGRN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.56% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $191M | $62M |
| Since | 2014 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.46% | 0.82% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +38.8% | -0.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +12.8% | +1.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.3% | -6.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.49 | 0.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.21% | 23.19% |
| Max drawdown | -45.32% | -66.37% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KBA and KGRN
Explore further