Screener
KBA vs KLIP
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Index ETF vs KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF
Key differences
- KBA costs 0.39% less per year.
- KBA is classified as equity, while KLIP is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- KBA covers emerging markets markets; KLIP covers north america.
- KBA follows a index tracking strategy; KLIP uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, KBA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- KBA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KBA | KLIP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.56% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $191M | $114M |
| Since | 2014 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 1.46% | 28.57% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.9% | +1.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.0% | +10.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.53 | 0.46 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.48% | 15.47% |
| Max drawdown | -45.32% | -18.61% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KBA and KLIP
Explore further