Screener
KLIP vs KWEB
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF vs KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
Key differences
- KWEB costs 0.25% less per year.
- KWEB is significantly larger than KLIP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KLIP is classified as alternative, while KWEB is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- KLIP covers north america markets; KWEB covers emerging markets.
- KLIP follows a option income strategy; KWEB uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, KLIP has delivered higher annualized returns.
- KWEB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KLIP | KWEB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.70% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $114M | $6.3B |
| Since | 2023 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 28.57% | 7.42% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | emerging markets |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +1.4% | -15.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.6% | +4.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -14.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.46 | 0.19 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.47% | 26.84% |
| Max drawdown | -18.61% | -80.92% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KLIP and KWEB
Explore further