Screener
KBA vs KWEB
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Index ETF vs KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
Key differences
- KBA costs 0.14% less per year.
- KWEB is significantly larger than KBA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, KBA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| KBA | KWEB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.56% | 0.70% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $191M | $6.3B |
| Since | 2014 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 1.46% | 7.42% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.9% | -15.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.0% | +4.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.9% | -14.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.53 | 0.19 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.48% | 26.84% |
| Max drawdown | -45.32% | -80.92% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KBA and KWEB
Explore further