Screener
KBA vs KURE
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Index ETF vs KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF
Key differences
- KBA costs 0.09% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, KBA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| KBA | KURE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.56% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $191M | $82M |
| Since | 2014 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 1.46% | 4.14% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +42.9% | +3.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +14.0% | -4.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.9% | -14.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.53 | -0.14 |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.48% | 26.25% |
| Max drawdown | -45.32% | -68.53% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KBA and KURE
Explore further