Screener
KURE vs KGRN
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF vs KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology ETF
Key differences
- KURE costs 0.14% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, KGRN has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| KURE | KGRN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $82M | $62M |
| Since | 2018 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 4.14% | 0.82% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.5% | +2.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | -4.9% | +2.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | -14.7% | -6.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.14 | 0.12 |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.25% | 23.17% |
| Max drawdown | -68.53% | -66.37% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KURE and KGRN
Explore further