Screener
KEMQ vs KGRN
KraneShares FTSE Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF vs KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology ETF
Key differences
- KEMQ costs 0.29% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, KEMQ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| KEMQ | KGRN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $39M | $62M |
| Since | 2017 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 5.39% | 0.82% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.0% | -0.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.1% | +1.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | -3.0% | -6.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.72 | 0.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | 25.64% | 23.19% |
| Max drawdown | -70.72% | -66.37% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KEMQ and KGRN
Explore further