Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

KEMX vs XCNY

KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF

KEMX

KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF

KraneShares

Annual cost

0.24%

Fund size

$118M

XCNY

State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF

State Street Investment Management

Annual cost

0.19%

Fund size

$9M

Key differences

  • KEMX is significantly larger than XCNY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • KEMX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

KEMXXCNY
Annual cost (TER)0.24%0.19%
Fund size (AUM)$118M$9M
Since20192024
Dividend yield2.67%2.41%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging markets
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+74.0%+36.3%
CAGR 3Y+29.4%N/A
CAGR 5Y+14.0%N/A
Sharpe 3Y1.30N/A
Volatility 1Y22.26%16.58%
Max drawdown-38.80%-19.70%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to KEMX and XCNY