Screener
KEMX vs SPEM
KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF vs State Street SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
Key differences
- SPEM costs 0.17% less per year.
- SPEM is significantly larger than KEMX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, KEMX has delivered higher annualized returns.
- SPEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KEMX | SPEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.24% | 0.07% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $118M | $17.3B |
| Since | 2019 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 2.67% | 2.58% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +74.0% | +30.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +29.4% | +19.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +14.0% | +6.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.30 | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | 22.26% | 15.88% |
| Max drawdown | -38.80% | -36.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KEMX and SPEM
Explore further