Screener
KGRN vs KOMP
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF
Key differences
- KOMP costs 0.59% less per year.
- KOMP is significantly larger than KGRN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KGRN covers emerging markets markets; KOMP covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, KOMP has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| KGRN | KOMP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $62M | $2.7B |
| Since | 2017 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.82% | 1.60% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +2.9% | +49.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.3% | +22.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | -6.3% | +4.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.12 | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.17% | 23.05% |
| Max drawdown | -66.37% | -50.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KGRN and KOMP
Explore further