Screener
KURE vs KWEB
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF vs KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
Key differences
- KWEB is significantly larger than KURE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, KWEB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- KWEB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KURE | KWEB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.70% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $82M | $6.3B |
| Since | 2018 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 4.14% | 7.42% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.5% | -15.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | -4.9% | +4.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | -14.7% | -14.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.14 | 0.19 |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.25% | 26.84% |
| Max drawdown | -68.53% | -80.92% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KURE and KWEB
Explore further