Screener
KGRN vs KWEB
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology ETF vs KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
Key differences
- KWEB costs 0.09% less per year.
- KWEB is significantly larger than KGRN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, KWEB has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| KGRN | KWEB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.70% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $62M | $6.3B |
| Since | 2017 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | 0.82% | 7.42% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -0.5% | -15.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +1.3% | +2.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | -6.0% | -14.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.09 | 0.14 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.19% | 26.80% |
| Max drawdown | -66.37% | -80.92% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KGRN and KWEB
Explore further