Screener
KGRN vs PBW
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology ETF vs Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF
Key differences
- PBW costs 0.15% less per year.
- PBW is significantly larger than KGRN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KGRN covers emerging markets markets; PBW covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, PBW has delivered higher annualized returns.
- PBW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KGRN | PBW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.64% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $62M | $447M |
| Since | 2017 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 0.82% | 0.71% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -0.5% | +150.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +1.3% | +7.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | -6.0% | -8.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.09 | 0.29 |
| Volatility 1Y | 23.19% | 40.29% |
| Max drawdown | -66.37% | -89.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KGRN and PBW
Explore further