Screener
KLIP vs KURE
KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF vs KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF
Key differences
- KURE costs 0.30% less per year.
- KLIP is classified as alternative, while KURE is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- KLIP covers north america markets; KURE covers emerging markets.
- KLIP follows a option income strategy; KURE uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, KLIP has delivered higher annualized returns.
- KURE has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KLIP | KURE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $114M | $82M |
| Since | 2023 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 28.57% | 4.14% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | emerging markets |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +1.4% | +3.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.6% | -4.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -14.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.46 | -0.14 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.47% | 26.25% |
| Max drawdown | -18.61% | -68.53% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KLIP and KURE
Explore further