Screener
KWEB vs KURE
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF vs KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF
Key differences
- KWEB is significantly larger than KURE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, KWEB has delivered higher annualized returns.
- KWEB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KWEB | KURE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6.3B | $82M |
| Since | 2013 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 7.42% | 4.14% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -15.2% | +3.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.3% | -4.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | -14.4% | -14.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.19 | -0.14 |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.84% | 26.25% |
| Max drawdown | -80.92% | -68.53% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KWEB and KURE
Explore further