Screener
KLMT vs EFA
Invesco MSCI Global Climate 500 ETF vs iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
Key differences
- KLMT costs 0.22% less per year.
- EFA is significantly larger than KLMT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EFA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KLMT | EFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.10% | 0.32% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.5B | $75.6B |
| Since | 2024 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 1.84% | 3.17% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.7% | +22.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.65% | 15.12% |
| Max drawdown | -16.88% | -34.19% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KLMT and EFA
Explore further