Screener
KMAR vs PGF
Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - March vs Invesco Financial Preferred ETF
Key differences
- PGF costs 0.24% less per year.
- PGF is significantly larger than KMAR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- KMAR is classified as alternative, while PGF is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- KMAR follows a structured outcome strategy; PGF uses index tracking.
- PGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KMAR | PGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $35M | $719M |
| Since | 2025 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 6.24% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.0% | +6.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -0.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.38% | 6.36% |
| Max drawdown | -10.06% | -28.92% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KMAR and PGF
Explore further