Screener
KPHO vs EEMA
KraneShares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF
Key differences
Both KPHO and EEMA are equity ETFs. KPHO charges 1.03% a year and EEMA 0.49%. The main difference: EEMA costs 0.54% less per year.
- EEMA costs 0.54% less per year.
- EEMA is much larger than KPHO. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- EEMA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KPHO | EEMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.03% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $1.3B |
| Since | 2025 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.18% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +43.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +22.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.94 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 21.37% |
| Max drawdown | -14.34% | -44.18% |
Similar to KPHO and EEMA
Explore further