Screener
KPHO vs EEM
KraneShares Dragon Capital Vietnam Growth Index ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
Key differences
Both KPHO and EEM are equity ETFs. KPHO charges 1.03% a year and EEM 0.72%. The main difference: EEM costs 0.31% less per year.
- EEM costs 0.31% less per year.
- EEM is much larger than KPHO. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- EEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KPHO | EEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.03% | 0.72% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $13M | $30.3B |
| Since | 2025 | 2003 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.77% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +42.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +22.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.98 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 21.09% |
| Max drawdown | -14.34% | -39.82% |
Similar to KPHO and EEM
Explore further