Screener
KURE vs KLIP
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF vs KraneShares KWEB Covered Call Strategy ETF
Key differences
- KURE costs 0.30% less per year.
- KURE is classified as equity, while KLIP is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- KURE covers emerging markets markets; KLIP covers north america.
- KURE follows a index tracking strategy; KLIP uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, KLIP has delivered higher annualized returns.
- KURE has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| KURE | KLIP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $82M | $114M |
| Since | 2018 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 4.14% | 28.57% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.5% | +1.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | -4.9% | +10.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | -14.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.14 | 0.46 |
| Volatility 1Y | 26.25% | 15.47% |
| Max drawdown | -68.53% | -18.61% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to KURE and KLIP
Explore further